Free cookie consent management tool by TermsFeed
March 9, 2023
|
Recruitment Advice

Avoid "Catfishing" Whilst Hiring

March 9, 2023
|
Recruitment Advice
Download Resource;

Catfishing is usually associated with online relationships, but the same principle can apply to recruitment. In this context, it occurs when an employer or candidate presents a misleading version of themselves to secure a job offer or appointment.

Employers may exaggerate the quality of a role, workplace culture or benefits. Candidates may overstate their experience, qualifications or achievements. In both cases, the result is the same: trust is damaged before the working relationship has properly begun.

A successful appointment depends on both sides having an accurate understanding of what is being offered and expected.

What Is Recruitment Catfishing?

Recruitment catfishing happens when information shared during the hiring process is deliberately or significantly misleading.

It can involve:

  • Exaggerated claims
  • Important omissions
  • False promises
  • Misrepresented experience
  • Inaccurate job descriptions
  • Misleading information about culture or progression

Some mismatches arise through poor communication rather than deliberate dishonesty. However, when expectations and reality differ substantially, the employee-employer relationship can quickly deteriorate.

How Employers Can Catfish Candidates

Employers have considerable influence over an employee’s working life, including their environment, pay, development and daily responsibilities. Misrepresenting these areas can have a serious effect on the person who accepts the role.

Examples include:

  • Making the position sound more senior or strategic than it is
  • Exaggerating salary, bonuses or earning potential
  • Promising flexible or hybrid working that is later withdrawn
  • Failing to disclose excessive overtime or travel
  • Hiding workload, staffing or cultural problems
  • Overstating promotion and development opportunities
  • Misrepresenting the organisation’s financial stability
  • Presenting an idealised workplace culture

A candidate may accept an offer based on these promises, only to discover a very different reality after joining.

The Consequences for Employers

Misleading candidates may help secure an appointment in the short term, but it creates significant long-term risks.

These can include:

  • Early resignation
  • Reduced engagement
  • Poor performance
  • Negative employee reviews
  • Damage to the employer brand
  • Additional recruitment and onboarding costs
  • Loss of trust in management

Employees are more likely to tolerate a demanding role when its challenges were explained honestly from the beginning. They are far less likely to remain when they feel deliberately misled.

How Candidates Can Catfish Employers

Candidates can also misrepresent themselves during recruitment.

Examples include:

  • Exaggerating responsibilities
  • Claiming achievements that belong to a wider team
  • Inflating technical competence
  • Providing false employment dates
  • Misrepresenting qualifications
  • Hiding important gaps or dismissals
  • Supplying false references
  • Claiming experience they do not possess

A polished CV or confident interview can sometimes conceal a significant gap between the candidate’s claims and actual ability.

Why Candidates Misrepresent Themselves

Competition can create pressure to stand out.

Some candidates may believe they need to exaggerate because they:

  • Do not meet every requirement
  • Fear being filtered out by recruitment software
  • Have been rejected repeatedly
  • Want to secure a higher salary
  • Believe other applicants are doing the same
  • Lack confidence in their genuine experience

However, overselling yourself can have serious consequences. If the appointment is based on false information, the employee may be unable to perform effectively once the role begins.

The Risks for Candidates

Misrepresentation can lead to:

  • Withdrawal of a job offer
  • Dismissal
  • Loss of professional credibility
  • Damaged references
  • Difficulty securing future roles
  • Possible legal or contractual consequences

Even when the false claim is not discovered immediately, maintaining it can create ongoing stress and increase the likelihood of failure in the role.

How Employers Can Verify Candidate Information

Employers should carry out proportionate checks before confirming an appointment.

These may include:

  • Confirming employment history
  • Verifying qualifications and licences
  • Contacting referees
  • Asking detailed competency-based questions
  • Using practical or technical assessments
  • Reviewing inconsistencies in dates and responsibilities
  • Conducting appropriate background checks

Online information may provide additional context, but employers should use it carefully and avoid making assumptions based on a candidate’s private life or limited social-media presence.

How Candidates Can Protect Themselves

Candidates should assess an employer just as carefully as the employer assesses them.

Useful questions include:

  • Why is the role available?
  • What are the biggest challenges?
  • What does a typical week look like?
  • How often are employees expected to work outside normal hours?
  • What flexibility is genuinely available?
  • How is performance measured?
  • What happened to the previous postholder?
  • What development opportunities have employees actually received?

Candidates can also research employee reviews, recent company news and staff turnover, while recognising that no single source provides the complete picture.

Job Descriptions Must Reflect Reality

A strong job description should explain:

  • Core responsibilities
  • Reporting lines
  • Working arrangements
  • Required travel
  • Salary and benefits
  • Key objectives
  • Likely challenges
  • Available resources

Employers should avoid using vague or inflated language simply to generate more applications.

A realistic advert may attract fewer candidates, but those who apply are more likely to understand and accept the genuine demands of the position.

Honesty Creates Better Appointments

Recruitment works best when both parties can make an informed decision.

Employers should be open about:

  • The challenges of the role
  • Available resources
  • Workplace expectations
  • Culture
  • Progression
  • Pay and benefits

Candidates should be equally honest about:

  • Their capabilities
  • Development areas
  • Experience
  • Qualifications
  • Motivation
  • Reasons for moving

No candidate is perfect, and no organisation is without challenges. Honesty does not weaken either side—it creates a more reliable foundation for success.

Final Thoughts

Recruitment catfishing may help an employer or candidate progress through the hiring process, but it rarely produces a successful long-term outcome.

Misleading job descriptions, false promises and exaggerated CV claims damage trust and increase the risk of a poor appointment. The strongest recruitment relationships are built through realistic expectations, careful verification and open communication.

When employers present the role honestly and candidates represent their experience accurately, both sides are far more likely to make the right decision—and build a productive working relationship that lasts.

Those starting out will find facilities coordinator and assistant roles listed alongside the senior appointments.